- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:51:54 -0600
- To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, site-comments@w3.org
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 22:00, fantasai wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/ > > Not entirely sure what this is or who I should be contacting, > but I think rel="details" would be better expressed as > rev="abstract" (or rev="description", to keep with the RSS > terminology). If I'm understanding the RSS correctly, the > linked document is not details but the actual thing being > described in the 'item'. Hmm... interesting point. Since the main place where this matters is our homepage, I've taken the liberty of copying site-comments, which has a public archive. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/ I presume you don't mind. Ah... in fact, I see that you already particpate in W3C mailing lists with public archives... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0148.html > ~fantasai -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 11:52:16 UTC