Re: vcard:AddressBook

And I guess more importantly, would a yes or a no to that question mean we
should keep it unpublished?

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 18:36, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote:

> That’s a good question. Are there other examples where RDF classes are
> used to describe non-RDF documents?
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:41, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>
>> Is a vcard file in ietf format a vcard:Addressbook in this sense?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 16:34 Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Unless someone objects I will contact W3C staff to make the edit in
>>> https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michiel
>>>
>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:41, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The reaction on the Calsify mailing list (from my respected personal
>>>> friend Hans-Joerg Happel) sounded positive:
>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/17sFwUiDu-zp77vbiQBJRjR-_L8/
>>>> There was also a thumbs-up from Pete Rivett on Tim Berners-Lee point
>>>> here:
>>>> https://github.com/solid/contacts/issues/8#issuecomment-2719050285
>>>>
>>>> That makes me think that adding the terms from
>>>> https://github.com/solid/contacts/pull/12/files?short_path=d90e4ed#diff-d90e4edb2d214338309e8948af2f00da8dac0954ae325f903ad5b85d9ae6e9e5
>>>> into https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns could be a reasonable path
>>>> forward? What would be the next step to explore that?
>>>>
>>>> And in general, can we (as a DX improvement) create links from
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns to https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/
>>>> and the other documents that describe it?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> Michiel de Jong
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 16:19, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-03-20 15:52, Michiel de Jong wrote:
>>>>> > Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF
>>>>> terms
>>>>> > existing only at W3C: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/
>>>>> > TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/
>>>>> > calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to increase the chances of getting new terms into vCard, I
>>>>> suggest dialing back on Solid. Sharing implementation experience is
>>>>> very
>>>>> useful, but be prepared to generalise it - without making it seem
>>>>> Solid-specific - so that it has broader applicability and a higher
>>>>> chance of gaining wider support. Anything Solid-centric for vCard use
>>>>> will most likely need to remain within the Solid ecosystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sarven
>>>>> https://csarven.ca/#i
>>>>>
>>>>>