Re: vcard:AddressBook

That’s a good question. Are there other examples where RDF classes are used
to describe non-RDF documents?


On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:41, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> Is a vcard file in ietf format a vcard:Addressbook in this sense?
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 16:34 Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Unless someone objects I will contact W3C staff to make the edit in
>> https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michiel
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:41, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The reaction on the Calsify mailing list (from my respected personal
>>> friend Hans-Joerg Happel) sounded positive:
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/17sFwUiDu-zp77vbiQBJRjR-_L8/
>>> There was also a thumbs-up from Pete Rivett on Tim Berners-Lee point
>>> here: https://github.com/solid/contacts/issues/8#issuecomment-2719050285
>>>
>>> That makes me think that adding the terms from
>>> https://github.com/solid/contacts/pull/12/files?short_path=d90e4ed#diff-d90e4edb2d214338309e8948af2f00da8dac0954ae325f903ad5b85d9ae6e9e5
>>> into https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns could be a reasonable path
>>> forward? What would be the next step to explore that?
>>>
>>> And in general, can we (as a DX improvement) create links from
>>> https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns to https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/
>>> and the other documents that describe it?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Michiel de Jong
>>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 16:19, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-20 15:52, Michiel de Jong wrote:
>>>> > Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF
>>>> terms
>>>> > existing only at W3C: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/
>>>> > TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/
>>>> > calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you want to increase the chances of getting new terms into vCard, I
>>>> suggest dialing back on Solid. Sharing implementation experience is
>>>> very
>>>> useful, but be prepared to generalise it - without making it seem
>>>> Solid-specific - so that it has broader applicability and a higher
>>>> chance of gaining wider support. Anything Solid-centric for vCard use
>>>> will most likely need to remain within the Solid ecosystem.
>>>>
>>>> -Sarven
>>>> https://csarven.ca/#i
>>>>
>>>>