Re: vcard:AddressBook

The reaction on the Calsify mailing list (from my respected personal friend
Hans-Joerg Happel) sounded positive:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/17sFwUiDu-zp77vbiQBJRjR-_L8/
There was also a thumbs-up from Pete Rivett on Tim Berners-Lee point here:
https://github.com/solid/contacts/issues/8#issuecomment-2719050285

That makes me think that adding the terms from
https://github.com/solid/contacts/pull/12/files?short_path=d90e4ed#diff-d90e4edb2d214338309e8948af2f00da8dac0954ae325f903ad5b85d9ae6e9e5
into https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns could be a reasonable path forward?
What would be the next step to explore that?

And in general, can we (as a DX improvement) create links from
https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns to https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/ and
the other documents that describe it?

Many thanks,
Michiel de Jong

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 16:19, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

> On 2025-03-20 15:52, Michiel de Jong wrote:
> > Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF terms
> > existing only at W3C: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/
> > TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/
> > calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/>
>
>
> If you want to increase the chances of getting new terms into vCard, I
> suggest dialing back on Solid. Sharing implementation experience is very
> useful, but be prepared to generalise it - without making it seem
> Solid-specific - so that it has broader applicability and a higher
> chance of gaining wider support. Anything Solid-centric for vCard use
> will most likely need to remain within the Solid ecosystem.
>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i
>
>