Re: vcard:AddressBook

Unless someone objects I will contact W3C staff to make the edit in
https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns.

Cheers,
Michiel

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:41, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote:

> The reaction on the Calsify mailing list (from my respected personal
> friend Hans-Joerg Happel) sounded positive:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/17sFwUiDu-zp77vbiQBJRjR-_L8/
> There was also a thumbs-up from Pete Rivett on Tim Berners-Lee point here:
> https://github.com/solid/contacts/issues/8#issuecomment-2719050285
>
> That makes me think that adding the terms from
> https://github.com/solid/contacts/pull/12/files?short_path=d90e4ed#diff-d90e4edb2d214338309e8948af2f00da8dac0954ae325f903ad5b85d9ae6e9e5
> into https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns could be a reasonable path forward?
> What would be the next step to explore that?
>
> And in general, can we (as a DX improvement) create links from
> https://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns to https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/ and
> the other documents that describe it?
>
> Many thanks,
> Michiel de Jong
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 16:19, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-03-20 15:52, Michiel de Jong wrote:
>> > Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF terms
>> > existing only at W3C: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/
>> > TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/
>> > calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/>
>>
>>
>> If you want to increase the chances of getting new terms into vCard, I
>> suggest dialing back on Solid. Sharing implementation experience is very
>> useful, but be prepared to generalise it - without making it seem
>> Solid-specific - so that it has broader applicability and a higher
>> chance of gaining wider support. Anything Solid-centric for vCard use
>> will most likely need to remain within the Solid ecosystem.
>>
>> -Sarven
>> https://csarven.ca/#i
>>
>>