- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:19:06 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: public-solid@w3.org
On 2025-03-20 15:52, Michiel de Jong wrote: > Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF terms > existing only at W3C: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/ > TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ > calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/> If you want to increase the chances of getting new terms into vCard, I suggest dialing back on Solid. Sharing implementation experience is very useful, but be prepared to generalise it - without making it seem Solid-specific - so that it has broader applicability and a higher chance of gaining wider support. Anything Solid-centric for vCard use will most likely need to remain within the Solid ecosystem. -Sarven https://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2025 15:19:14 UTC