Re: vcard:AddressBook

Thanks! I asked them how they would feel about vCard-related RDF terms
existing only at W3C:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/TtTXanhR-iK39MUIiaQv41lnS7U/

Cheers,
Michiel

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 09:54, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

> See the invitation below for one route to first updating vCard, and then
> nudging W3C to updating vcard-rdf - via a WG or another path to updating
> ns/ - down the line.
>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        vcard:AddressBook
> Date:   Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:35:36 +0700
> From:   Orie <orie@or13.io>
> CC:     ADs ART <art-ads@ietf.org>, calext-chairs@ietf.org
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In the calext wg session today:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/calext/about/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/calext/about/>
>
> Pete Resnick mentioned there was some discussion originating from W3C on
> interest in vCard.
>
> I gather there may be interest in updating vCARD to add some new terms.
>
> I want to invite you to share that discussion with the IETF list:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
>
> In particular if you have motivating use cases for new extensions or
> some description of desired fields not currently present in vCard.
>
> I'm happy to help further explain options if I can gather a better
> understanding of your use cases.
>
> Also happy to answer any questions you may have about the IETF process.
>
> Regards,
>
> OS, ART AD
>