Re: Aging of 'HTTP Vocabulary in RDF'

Hi Danny,

You can at least look at your own HTTP-in-RDF data as Turtle :)
https://github.com/AtomGraph/HTTP-in-RDF

Martynas
atomgraph.com

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 21.23, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:

> re.  https://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/
>
> This probably applies to a lot of the specs from whatever 2022-2007=.
>
> Virtually unintelligible. The arcane spec text is fair enough, the
> specification is still entirely valid, just it is very hard to read, let
> alone use.
>
> No crit on the original authors, good job well done. But that was ages ago.
>
> I don't know what the process would be, but if anyone could see fit to
> transcribing it into Turtle, that would make a huge difference. Also a lot
> of editorial to make it more approachable to a fresh young coder in 2022
> (and me). I know (/knew) RDF/XML yet now can't read it.
>
> I wanted this today, silly thing of a test echoing headers, wanted to have
> RDF there. Try to find the ref - ok - but the examples are in year 2000
> language and I have to bounce around to see what the namespace is.
>
> No longer fit for purpose.
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----
>
> https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja>
>
>