Re: Aging of 'HTTP Vocabulary in RDF'

also not Java not JS...typescript angular react...rust...wasm!

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 21:45, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
wrote:

> Hi Danny,
>
> You can at least look at your own HTTP-in-RDF data as Turtle :)
> https://github.com/AtomGraph/HTTP-in-RDF
>
> Martynas
> atomgraph.com
>
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 21.23, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> re.  https://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/
>>
>> This probably applies to a lot of the specs from whatever 2022-2007=.
>>
>> Virtually unintelligible. The arcane spec text is fair enough, the
>> specification is still entirely valid, just it is very hard to read, let
>> alone use.
>>
>> No crit on the original authors, good job well done. But that was ages
>> ago.
>>
>> I don't know what the process would be, but if anyone could see fit to
>> transcribing it into Turtle, that would make a huge difference. Also a lot
>> of editorial to make it more approachable to a fresh young coder in 2022
>> (and me). I know (/knew) RDF/XML yet now can't read it.
>>
>> I wanted this today, silly thing of a test echoing headers, wanted to
>> have RDF there. Try to find the ref - ok - but the examples are in year
>> 2000 language and I have to bounce around to see what the namespace is.
>>
>> No longer fit for purpose.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Danny.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ----
>>
>> https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja>
>>
>>

-- 
----

https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja>

Received on Saturday, 26 November 2022 20:58:34 UTC