Aging of 'HTTP Vocabulary in RDF'

re.  https://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/

This probably applies to a lot of the specs from whatever 2022-2007=.

Virtually unintelligible. The arcane spec text is fair enough, the
specification is still entirely valid, just it is very hard to read, let
alone use.

No crit on the original authors, good job well done. But that was ages ago.

I don't know what the process would be, but if anyone could see fit to
transcribing it into Turtle, that would make a huge difference. Also a lot
of editorial to make it more approachable to a fresh young coder in 2022
(and me). I know (/knew) RDF/XML yet now can't read it.

I wanted this today, silly thing of a test echoing headers, wanted to have
RDF there. Try to find the ref - ok - but the examples are in year 2000
language and I have to bounce around to see what the namespace is.

No longer fit for purpose.

Cheers,
Danny.






-- 
----

https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja>