- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 20:04:01 +0200
- To: Frans Knibbe <fjknibbe@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I'm talking about a datatype that identifies RDF graphs, as defined by the standard. The triple I provide does not say that the graph is published in Turtle. I could write: <antoine> <madePublication> [ <inFormat> "RDF/XML"; <content> "ex:x a owl:Thing"^^rdf:turtle ] . If the datatype IRI rdf:turtle is too confusing, it could be rdf:GraphLiteral, as suggested by Ivan in his draft. The point is not on the specific IRI that we use to recognise the datatype. The point is on the idea of recognising a datatype that identifies graphs (or rather, the equivalent class of graphs wrt the isomorphism relation, such that the change of blank nodes does not affect the value of the literal). --AZ Le 07/05/2021 à 19:00, Frans Knibbe a écrit : > > Op vr 7 mei 2021 om 17:09 schreef Antoine Zimmermann > <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr <mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>>: > > > <antoine> <published> "ex:x a owl:Thing"^^rdf:turtle > > > What if Antoine published his triple or graph in a triple store that > supports multiple RDF formats (of which Turtle could or could not be one)? > In other words: isn't there a significant difference between a graph and > the format in which a graph may be expressed? > > Greetings, > Frans > -- Antoine Zimmermann École des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel CS 62362 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/
Received on Friday, 7 May 2021 18:04:18 UTC