W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2020

Re: vocabulary repos?

From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:36:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sr4kRbWThj_8i=OwZK-+G5dm97viF791=vxrpsU90+krQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Farnbauer-Schmidt, Matthias" <matthias.farnbauer-schmidt@fau.de>
Cc: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
Thank you all
Simon and Armando
I need a hosted web based resources, ie, I dont intend to maintainmy own
server

(I could get one but I really want to use web based  hosted services)

Simon, can you suggest a service provider?

Armando, the description says it is web based, but thats not my definition
of web based
(needs to be deployed first, do you have suggestions for providers who may
offer
instances?_
Maria, I visited the UPM resource today and I saw that to add
a vocabulary you can do so by entering a URL ( +suggest) , which I will do
after I have a URL

Please keep suggestions coming, in the sense that vocabularies are still
important for new knowledge domain, and since my laptop and many websites
are impermanent
I really would like to store resources somewhere they are more likely to
live longer than myself and my laptop

the other thing would be to create a list on wiki of course

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 6:08 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you
> solid TBL latest gig right? (someone else pointed to solid in another
> reply but I haven't followed up yet, apols)
> would be good to have an opportunity to start working with it  (only hear
> of solid so far)
>
> Matthias, to save me reading the specs
> I need the resources to be deployed online via url and possibly have an
> xml output
> (create the resource via html form and output as csv and/or xml)
> please let me know if you know who d be  the best provider for it
> also I dont mind paying a (small, reasonable) fee if its solid  :-)
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:05 PM Farnbauer-Schmidt, Matthias <
> matthias.farnbauer-schmidt@fau.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paola,
>>
>>
>> another alternative for an easy deployment is to use a SOLID POD
>> (Personal Online Datastore). There are some providers which give you a POD
>> for free [1]. The nice things you get out of the box are:
>>
>> - Fine-grained access control via WebID.
>>
>> - You can update resources via PATCH request [2].
>>
>> - The solid servers implement content negotiation, e.g. try <code>$> curl
>> -L -H "Accept: application/ld+json" "
>> https://mattes-white.inrupt.net/public/open/test.ttl"</code> to get a
>> JSON-LD version of a Turtle-rendered-resource from my POD.
>>
>> - As long as you choose a reliable provider you don't have to worry about
>> the deployment yourself.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://solidproject.org/use-solid/
>>
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/blob/master/api-rest.md#alternative-using-sparql-1
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Matthias
>> ------------------------------
>> *Von:* Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 07:51:51
>> *An:* paoladimaio10@googlemail.com; SW-forum
>> *Betreff:* RE: vocabulary repos?
>>
>>
>> Hi Paolo –
>>
>>
>>
>> We run a system locally based on Epimorphics open-source Linked Data
>> Registry stack.
>>
>> I don’t think we can offer a general purpose service, but you might be
>> able to deploy your own.
>>
>>
>>
>> See http://registry.it.csiro.au/def and
>> https://github.com/UKGovLD/registry-core
>>
>>
>>
>> It does per-item updates, with a transparent versioning trace.
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 29 October, 2020 14:50
>> *To:* SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* vocabulary repos?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hellow
>>
>>
>>
>> I am still compiling lists of terms and would like to share them as
>> public heritage
>>
>>
>>
>> Do people on this list have recommendations somewhere easy yet nicely
>> structured for where to upload or curate online vocabularies?
>>
>>
>>
>> should be updatable one term at a time, rendered as downloadable xml ,
>> access level and privileges and other features welcome
>>
>>
>>
>> please advise
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> PDM
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2020 10:37:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:42:12 UTC