- From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:54:55 +0200
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>, Chris Harding <chris@lacibus.net>, xyzscy <1047571207@qq.com>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL7_Mo8m9NDYxLa4TO603-0h9FNCaOhWV-HdpimBTUguRBmbaA@mail.gmail.com>
Le ven. 21 juin 2019 à 16:27, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> a écrit : > Researchers in Cognitive Science have used graphs of chunks to represent > declarative knowledge for decades, and chunk is their name for an n-tuple. > I tried to lookup "graph of chunks" related to cognitive science. I could not find anything interesting outside this white paper about "accelerating science" [0] that intersect with my goals. [0] https://cra.org/ccc/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/02/Accelerating-Science-Whitepaper-CCC-Final2.pdf > What’s more interesting is that to model the characteristics of human > memory, chunks can be associated with a couple of properties: strength and > activation. Recall is stochastic. The more useful a memory the more likely > you will be able to recall it when needed. This is essential when dealing > with very large collections of memories (chunks) in order for reasoning to > avoid drowning in a tidal wave of recollections. > That is similar to what opencog project use. > Computer Science has a lot to learn from Cognitive Science. > Yes sure. That was my first choice 10 years ago, but I settled on computer science school, because I feared that I would not find a job in Cognitive Science. The end results is that I have the skills to build most of the things I can dream of, but I can dream of nothing that is particularly useful. I mean Cognitive Science are like the tinkerers side whereas computer science is the do side. Otherwise said, I think that good new ideas can come up from cognitive science. > On 21 Jun 2019, at 13:14, Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Le ven. 14 juin 2019 à 04:38, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Chris >> KG can also be any n-tuple, isnt it? >> > > I agree with you. That is what I have been working. > > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2019 13:55:33 UTC