- From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 04:32:43 +0000
- To: "Bradwell (US), Prachant" <prachant.bradwell@boeing.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SN6PR01MB46385A9B9696830522C84E55C5F20@SN6PR01MB4638.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Prachant Bradwell, Also for purposes of discussion: 4. What do you think about a consortium model, e.g. an international Artificial Intelligence Data Consortium, perhaps improving upon the Linguistic Data Consortium model (https://www.ldc.upenn.edu/about)? Best regards, Adam Sobieski ________________________________ From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 6:36:24 PM To: Bradwell (US), Prachant; semantic-web@w3.org Subject: RE: World AI Governance Body Prachant Bradwell, Interesting ideas. Some points for discussion: 1. Why would or should scientists choose to defer to the voting results of an intranational or international supermajority of participants? * Historical opinions to consider include those of James Madison. 2. Instead of voting-based systems, what about argumentation-based systems and other group reasoning and group decision-making systems (see: [1], [2])? 3. What do you think about democratizing and/or crowdsourcing content for portions of artificial intelligence textbooks and courses, e.g. portions discussing comparative ethical standards pertaining to artificial intelligence (see: [3])? Best regards, Adam Sobieski [1] Klein, Mark. "Achieving collective intelligence via large-scale on-line argumentation." In Second International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW'07), pp. 58-58. IEEE, 2007. [2] Carrascosa, Iván Palomares. Large Group Decision Making: Creating Decision Support Approaches at Scale. Springer, 2018. [3] Russell, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Malaysia; Pearson Education Limited,, 2016. ________________________________ From: Bradwell (US), Prachant <prachant.bradwell@boeing.com> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 4:30:30 PM To: semantic-web@w3.org Subject: World AI Governance Body Hi all, What if there was a world governance body (e.g. UN, World Economic Forum, etc.) which enables voting for “high value data opportunities” that AI/linked data can be used to solve significant world problems. The voting system would work similar to Reddit, in which designated voters can “upvote” or “downvote” a high value opportunity. This would be the mechanism for prioritization. The highest scores would receive the top priority. Those opportunities which receive 0 or fewer would not be actionable until further review. This could create work for nonprofits, private, and public entities through competition and/or collaboration, enabling quick development of solutions. This could enable us to prioritize and attack key issues such as climate change with advanced technologies on a world stage. Last, policy for this voting body would require a supermajority vote; which would in my opinion help enable truly global ethical decisions. Thoughts? Sent from my iPhone
Received on Friday, 12 July 2019 04:33:08 UTC