- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:12:34 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Uhm, isn't that what JSON-LD @context does? On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:22 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > As I am sure you know, there is a wide proliferation of JSON on the web > > Yet (in 2019!) we do not have a standard way for developers, and automated tools, to map a JSON predicate into a URI > > I've suggested in the past : > > foo -> urn:string:foo > > But that has yet to gain mind share. Tim has suggested we have an HTTP JSON ontology. So, possibly that is the way to go. Reason being that a random URI is hard to gain consensus on. But if someone goes to the effort of creating a JSON HTTP URI you are unlikely to get two of them. > > Two issues > > 1. Wouldnt there be a huge number of terms in a JSON ontology -- should we maybe dynamically create entries? > > 2. Where would it be stored? w3.org ? w3id? somewhere else. > > If we can reach a consensus on this, I would seem that would be a way to bootstrap a lot of the existing web?
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2018 18:13:07 UTC