Re: AIML?

Eric
Yes, of course getting the key stakeholders involved-

 since you are familiar with the member base
i ll be happy to pitch directly members who are working on AI
if you could suggest a way to shortlist them/approach them

P

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> * Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> [2018-05-12 15:15+0530]
> > Thank you Eric
> >
> > at this stage, I was thinking of some web based knowledge representation
> > mechanism or ML for something that I am working on related to AI
> > (I have learned my lessons- glad to share details of this early concept
> > offlist to those who may express interest until it's solid )
> >
> > I did a search, and found AIML which seems the closest to what I require
> > however could not find a formal specification to study it further, and
> > wondered about any interest to W3C.
> >
> > I am pretty sure the web needs what I am thinking of, to what extent its
> > feasible or we can find folks to do it and adopt it, I dunno
>
> To motivate standardization, you have to dig up use cases that not
> only need some technology, but motivate distinct entities using a
> common form or interface to that technology. So a win would be
> e.g. when folks can combine commodity tools to generate such data
> with commodity tools which make use of it.
>
>
> > >  There's nothing saying you
> > > can't have a hybrid system which e.g. uses SemWeb for entity
> > > recognition (à la NCBO annotator) or records ML assertions in RDF for
> > > further rule execution. That requires people to have expertise and
> > > commitment in both camps and so far, those folks haven't banded
> > > together with a set of shared use cases and goals.
> >
> >
> > Am thinking of something fluid,  ML should be sufficient for my
> requirement
> > at this stage- also confess that i favour simplicity over sophistication
> >
> > but could not find anything that does what I require so thinking maybe
> > something can be done-
> >
> >
> > > If you can muster
> > > the troops (an army of five, to be exact), you can easily create a W3C
> > > Community Group (see [CREATE A COMMUNITY GROUP] at
> > > <https://www.w3.org/community/groups/>).
> > >
> >
> > yep, done it before. I chaired a nice group that did good work for one
> year
> > then suddenly fell silent and I am still traumatized  by the experience.
> :-)
> > (joke - it was valuable!)
> >
> >  anyone interested in AI ML of sorts who is reliable and competent  (not
> > afraid of failure?) welcome to brainstorm offlist to discuss early stage
> > concept for this work
> >
> > , I need specifically folks who can do implementation side of things
> > (writing a parsers for validation, and implement the test cases etc) and
> > who are good at getting research funding - I am okay with the concept and
> > system design part, and that's about it
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > The tutorial seemed to be about a template language for natural
> > > language interfaces while the overview seemed to go more into the
> > > actual processing logic. Do you know if AIML captures AI logic and
> > > what use cases would motivate favoring such a standard for Semantic
> > > Web work?
> > >
> >
> > No, guess not but not sure. AIML seems very very thin at the moment,
> > although there is a free working prototype online which seems to be
> using it
> > https://home.pandorabots.com/en/
> >
> > I think there's work to be done-
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -ericP
> > >
> > > office: +1.617.599.3509
> > > mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
> > >
> > > (eric@w3.org)
> > > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other
> than
> > > email address distribution.
> > >
> > > There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> > > which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*
>
> --
> -ericP
>
> office: +1.617.599.3509
> mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
>
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> email address distribution.
>
> There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
>



-- 
*A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*