Re: AIML?

* Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> [2018-05-12 15:15+0530]
> Thank you Eric
> 
> at this stage, I was thinking of some web based knowledge representation
> mechanism or ML for something that I am working on related to AI
> (I have learned my lessons- glad to share details of this early concept
> offlist to those who may express interest until it's solid )
> 
> I did a search, and found AIML which seems the closest to what I require
> however could not find a formal specification to study it further, and
> wondered about any interest to W3C.
> 
> I am pretty sure the web needs what I am thinking of, to what extent its
> feasible or we can find folks to do it and adopt it, I dunno

To motivate standardization, you have to dig up use cases that not
only need some technology, but motivate distinct entities using a
common form or interface to that technology. So a win would be
e.g. when folks can combine commodity tools to generate such data
with commodity tools which make use of it.


> >  There's nothing saying you
> > can't have a hybrid system which e.g. uses SemWeb for entity
> > recognition (à la NCBO annotator) or records ML assertions in RDF for
> > further rule execution. That requires people to have expertise and
> > commitment in both camps and so far, those folks haven't banded
> > together with a set of shared use cases and goals.
> 
> 
> Am thinking of something fluid,  ML should be sufficient for my requirement
> at this stage- also confess that i favour simplicity over sophistication
> 
> but could not find anything that does what I require so thinking maybe
> something can be done-
> 
> 
> > If you can muster
> > the troops (an army of five, to be exact), you can easily create a W3C
> > Community Group (see [CREATE A COMMUNITY GROUP] at
> > <https://www.w3.org/community/groups/>).
> >
> 
> yep, done it before. I chaired a nice group that did good work for one year
> then suddenly fell silent and I am still traumatized  by the experience. :-)
> (joke - it was valuable!)
> 
>  anyone interested in AI ML of sorts who is reliable and competent  (not
> afraid of failure?) welcome to brainstorm offlist to discuss early stage
> concept for this work
> 
> , I need specifically folks who can do implementation side of things
> (writing a parsers for validation, and implement the test cases etc) and
> who are good at getting research funding - I am okay with the concept and
> system design part, and that's about it
> 
> >
> > >
> >
> > The tutorial seemed to be about a template language for natural
> > language interfaces while the overview seemed to go more into the
> > actual processing logic. Do you know if AIML captures AI logic and
> > what use cases would motivate favoring such a standard for Semantic
> > Web work?
> >
> 
> No, guess not but not sure. AIML seems very very thin at the moment,
> although there is a free working prototype online which seems to be using it
> https://home.pandorabots.com/en/
> 
> I think there's work to be done-
> 
> >
> >
> > --
> > -ericP
> >
> > office: +1.617.599.3509
> > mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
> >
> > (eric@w3.org)
> > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> > email address distribution.
> >
> > There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> > which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Saturday, 12 May 2018 10:06:53 UTC