W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2018

rdf.stackexchange.com -- Identity problems numbers 3 and 5 - was Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:18:51 +0100
Message-Id: <61CE5553-3F81-4679-8C00-5A06868A24E0@bblfish.net>
Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>


> On 7 Dec 2018, at 15:08, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I know this was not the intention of the discussion participants, but that is certainly a reasonable view to take away.
> Maybe this is the wrong forum - is there somewhere else where I would get help?

Perhaps the trick for more pragmatic answers would be to open

   {rdf/semweb}.stackexchange.com

StackExchange is helpful because it forces people to ask a question clearly, 
and then once the answers are given and voted on, one does not need to 
answer them again.

   https://stackexchange.com/sites#

A discussion forum such as this one tends to always reopen issues because it is more
difficult to link to previous answers and there may just be too many of them.

Henry

I have found math.stackexchange.com very useful, and actually posted a semweb 
question on cstheory.stackexchange.com
https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/41578/what-does-the-category-of-rdf-models-look-like-in-institution-theory/41613



Received on Friday, 7 December 2018 15:19:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:42:03 UTC