- From: Marcel Fröhlich <marcel.frohlich@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:36:18 +0200
- To: cristiano longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com>
- Cc: "<semantic-web@w3.org>" <semantic-web@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHKA4Ly7Y5UK9g813GsrL+k_+A2XLLZPLMYnFXVrnCU59msFwg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Cristiano, thanks for the clarification. If RSS feed is summary of the site's content with links then I agree with Phil's proposal to type it as a distribution. Regards, Marcel 2016-08-18 14:28 GMT+02:00 cristiano longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com>: > Rss is a summary of the web site. It contains titles, summary and links to > all the articles of the site. Of course, in generale an rss feed may point > to contents from differenti sites. > > Il 18/ago/2016 02:23 PM, "Marcel Fröhlich" <marcel.frohlich@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > >> Hello Phil, >> >> is this really the intention of DCAT to allow a dataset denote something >> different than the distribution? >> (assuming RSS feed content != other website content) >> >> I never checked DCAT standards docs in detail, but my intuitive >> understanding is, that different distributions of a dataset should have the >> intention to cover the same content, just differing regarding format, >> access method and maybe version or specific restrictions. >> >> If a distribution is just "some data content" that is part of a dataset, >> then we look at a collection of of rather arbitrary objects, which is not >> what I'd like to be the definition of a dataset. >> >> If such a concept were required, I'd rather introduce the notion of a >> "component" type, to make clear that there is additional structure. Whereas >> in my opinion dataset vs. distribution should be looked at more like >> intentional definition vs. extensional definition ( >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensional_and_intensional_definitions). >> >> Cheers, Marcel >> >> @FroehlichMarcel >> >> >> 2016-08-18 13:22 GMT+02:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: >> >>> >>> >>> On 18/08/2016 11:16, cristiano longo wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Phil. I have two use cases. The former is simpler: i have an rdf >>>> dataset if events and associated a sparql endpoint, an rss feed and a >>>> Calendar file. Here it is quite clear that the rdf dataset have to be >>>> modeled as dcat!:Dataset whereas the sparql endpoint, the rss feed and >>>> the >>>> iCal file are distributions of this dataset. >>>> >>> >>> Yep. >>> >>> The latter case is more >>> >>>> confusing: i have just a website with some articles and an associated >>>> rss >>>> feed. I see nothing here that is obviously a dataset (however the >>>> definition of set of data is really large) >>>> >>> >>> Ah, right. Yes, the definition of a dataset is so broad that a website >>> counts, and I guess therefore an RSS feed counts as a distribution. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>>> Il 18/ago/2016 11:27 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi Cristiano, >>>>> >>>>> dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution are not disjoint so you can have an >>>>> RSS >>>>> feed as an instance of both. But it wouldn't be correct to have a >>>>> dcat:Dataset that was a collection of RSS feeds and then each of those >>>>> feeds as a Distribution since the Distribution is a way of accessing >>>>> the >>>>> full dataset. You may have an API that allows you to select subsets of >>>>> the >>>>> dataset (that's a hot topic for me at the moment) and so your >>>>> Distribution, >>>>> which is an API, might well yield a single RSS feed but you'll need to >>>>> think of it like that. >>>>> >>>>> I'm confusing myself just writing this but I hope it makes some sense. >>>>> And, it would be remiss of me, when talking about DCAT, not to point >>>>> you to >>>>> the workshop on that topic later this year: >>>>> https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sds >>>>> voc/ Your question is very much in scope for that. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Phil. >>>>> >>>>> On 17/08/2016 22:01, Cristiano Longo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks, I'm creating a list of intresting RSS feeds. I suppose that >>>>>> thet can be modeled as DCAT datasets (with RSS as distribution), am I >>>>>> right? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any suggestion or comment is welcome, >>>>>> >>>>>> CL >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phil Archer >>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>>>> >>>>> http://philarcher.org >>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>>>> @philarcher1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Phil Archer >>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>> >>> http://philarcher.org >>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>> @philarcher1 >>> >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2016 12:36:50 UTC