Re: Using DCAT for RSS

Rss is a summary of the web site. It contains titles, summary and links to
all the articles of the site. Of course, in generale an rss feed may point
to contents from differenti sites.

Il 18/ago/2016 02:23 PM, "Marcel Fröhlich" <marcel.frohlich@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Hello Phil,
>
> is this really the intention of DCAT to allow a dataset denote something
> different than the distribution?
> (assuming RSS feed content != other website content)
>
> I never checked DCAT standards docs in detail, but my intuitive
> understanding is, that different distributions of a dataset should have the
> intention to cover the same content, just differing regarding format,
> access method and maybe version or specific restrictions.
>
> If a distribution is just "some data content" that is part of a dataset,
> then we look at a collection of of rather arbitrary objects, which is not
> what I'd like to be the definition of a dataset.
>
> If such a concept were required, I'd rather introduce the notion of a
> "component" type, to make clear that there is additional structure. Whereas
> in my opinion dataset vs. distribution should be looked at more like
> intentional definition vs. extensional definition (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensional_and_intensional_definitions).
>
> Cheers, Marcel
>
> @FroehlichMarcel
>
>
> 2016-08-18 13:22 GMT+02:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18/08/2016 11:16, cristiano longo wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Phil. I have two use cases. The former is simpler: i have an rdf
>>> dataset if events and associated a sparql endpoint, an rss feed and a
>>> Calendar file. Here it is quite clear that the rdf dataset have to be
>>> modeled as dcat!:Dataset whereas the sparql endpoint, the rss feed and
>>> the
>>> iCal file are distributions of this dataset.
>>>
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>>  The latter case is more
>>
>>> confusing: i have just a website with some articles and an associated rss
>>> feed. I see nothing here that is obviously a dataset (however the
>>> definition of set of data is really large)
>>>
>>
>> Ah, right. Yes, the definition of a dataset is so broad that a website
>> counts, and I guess therefore an RSS feed counts as a distribution.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>> Il 18/ago/2016 11:27 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi Cristiano,
>>>>
>>>> dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution are not disjoint so you can have an
>>>> RSS
>>>> feed as an instance of both. But it wouldn't be correct to have a
>>>> dcat:Dataset that was a collection of RSS feeds and then each of those
>>>> feeds as a Distribution since the Distribution is a way of accessing the
>>>> full dataset. You may have an API that allows you to select subsets of
>>>> the
>>>> dataset (that's a hot topic for me at the moment) and so your
>>>> Distribution,
>>>> which is an API, might well yield a single RSS feed but you'll need to
>>>> think of it like that.
>>>>
>>>> I'm confusing myself just writing this but I hope it makes some sense.
>>>> And, it would be remiss of me, when talking about DCAT, not to point
>>>> you to
>>>> the workshop on that topic later this year:
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sds
>>>> voc/ Your question is very much in scope for that.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Phil.
>>>>
>>>> On 17/08/2016 22:01, Cristiano Longo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks, I'm creating a list of intresting RSS feeds. I suppose that
>>>>> thet can be modeled as DCAT datasets (with RSS as distribution), am I
>>>>> right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any suggestion or comment is welcome,
>>>>>
>>>>> CL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil Archer
>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>
>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>> @philarcher1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Phil Archer
>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>
>> http://philarcher.org
>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> @philarcher1
>>
>>
>