- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:49:57 -0800
- To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@yahoo-inc.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there going to be the possibility of at least listening in remotely? peter On 01/24/2015 12:02 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ATM I can only answer for disjointness axioms. We plan to use them for > cleaning up extracted data so we definitely want them. For the rest, we > are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we invite ontology > experts to participate. > > Best, Dimitris > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Good points all, I think. > > As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered > for the ontology language. For example, will disjointness axioms be > allowed, or local ranges, or constraints? > > peter > > On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas Torzec wrote: >> Hi Dimitris et al., > >> A) What is the specific use you have in mind? > >> B) Are you thinking about a centralized ontology managed by editors, a >> user-contributed ontology, or an automatically generated taxonomy? > >> C) How will it relate to other ontologies, taxonomies and schemas? >> Also, will it relate to Wikidata, Wikipedia, schema.org >> <http://schema.org>, > Facebook OG, etc. > >> D) How will you categorize Wiki pages (and possibly other documents) >> against this ontology? > >> Cheers. -N. > >> -- Nicolas Torzec Yahoo Labs. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in > Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of > bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely > compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet > _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion > mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion > > > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of > Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org > Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUw801AAoJECjN6+QThfjzd3gH/0zre80KqwpW2c/8Ugwd+KpU T94TmAmp+wKmyp5zLzvjXWPETLsnf9tPhTgK+tdPJBLqBsK+3aRO8pEA2h7oFpFy fJ//Jj7hOLEzg7/MkMRl3twnvylK3V1SybR2S/QIBjTuRPcRfRl5guxKd9L2yIIP ANAWtHpwb9RHepG/+E4GWIdeONc2QeaZp4Pf4siWDgKva/SKxMMn4XObFAJ/TY/H uAsXsqboou0mr8i1FyMt0CWoTmOZD7Ki3obZ/zQiwiV/CkBurZ+/tCbjN7dLKAbT iMRK7r5M0GN5Ow56rSwe5Y9uro3Pm1UIl/JohdTWExP04YLd4e1hC+p8qn+91lU= =ocPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2015 16:50:31 UTC