Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

Hi Peter,

ATM I can only answer for disjointness axioms. We plan to use them for
cleaning up extracted data so we definitely want them.
For the rest, we are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we
invite ontology experts to participate.

Best,
Dimitris

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Good points all, I think.
>
> As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered for
> the ontology language.  For example, will disjointness axioms be allowed,
> or
> local ranges, or constraints?
>
> peter
>
> On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas Torzec wrote:
> > Hi Dimitris et al.,
> >
> > A) What is the specific use you have in mind?
> >
> > B) Are you thinking about a centralized ontology managed by editors, a
> > user-contributed ontology, or an automatically generated taxonomy?
> >
> > C) How will it relate to other ontologies, taxonomies and schemas? Also,
> > will it relate to Wikidata, Wikipedia, schema.org, Facebook OG, etc.
> >
> > D) How will you categorize Wiki pages (and possibly other documents)
> > against this ontology?
> >
> > Cheers. -N.
> >
> > -- Nicolas Torzec Yahoo Labs.
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUwxXRAAoJECjN6+QThfjzHqgH/2EJ4W+ESivc2lINp4JwyI+/
> yaFg/+3714GPQSvApPEXuEAW5ssHRhBU68Lq90TcFm+fTjazb0Oc36qy0granfLe
> hFYAojBUKP9ZLDnEkiAxheeXPHrRdTK+yeJQI9/IuCpnrxkJsxL2b65Q1Oz0SSS+
> DR1qVrDEk5l4JC9oSWiy6UAAs0aJRyxktqV1gYw/PcCY1mE/yEgtL6PQD7K9TkGW
> RD0N2jWCI0zsAsp45P2RLC1aNNQ2KMlu6AiHlBm2REvlk3zaMc3liUX+rOGkL7wO
> aBCFI0gkCkbfooHiVnjvPvKZPy0WJkFaqbP3n8OzbCkaq+tnDr4F9lzCP74nvSM=
> =WQQm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>



-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas