- From: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Message-ID: <1961367407.443122.1422298138586.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
+1 on which expressive power for the ontology. It's important for inferences/validations.
-N.
From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Cc: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@yahoo-inc.com>; Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>; "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>; "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there going to be the possibility of at least listening in remotely?
peter
On 01/24/2015 12:02 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> ATM I can only answer for disjointness axioms. We plan to use them for
> cleaning up extracted data so we definitely want them. For the rest, we
> are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we invite ontology
> experts to participate.
>
> Best, Dimitris
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Good points all, I think.
>
> As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered
> for the ontology language. For example, will disjointness axioms be
> allowed, or local ranges, or constraints?
>
> peter
>
> On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas Torzec wrote:
>> Hi Dimitris et al.,
>
>> A) What is the specific use you have in mind?
>
>> B) Are you thinking about a centralized ontology managed by editors, a
>> user-contributed ontology, or an automatically generated taxonomy?
>
>> C) How will it relate to other ontologies, taxonomies and schemas?
>> Also, will it relate to Wikidata, Wikipedia, schema.org
>> <http://schema.org>,
> Facebook OG, etc.
>
>> D) How will you categorize Wiki pages (and possibly other documents)
>> against this ontology?
>
>> Cheers. -N.
>
>> -- Nicolas Torzec Yahoo Labs.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in
> Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of
> bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
> compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion
> mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
>
>
>
> -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of
> Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org
> Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUw801AAoJECjN6+QThfjzd3gH/0zre80KqwpW2c/8Ugwd+KpU
T94TmAmp+wKmyp5zLzvjXWPETLsnf9tPhTgK+tdPJBLqBsK+3aRO8pEA2h7oFpFy
fJ//Jj7hOLEzg7/MkMRl3twnvylK3V1SybR2S/QIBjTuRPcRfRl5guxKd9L2yIIP
ANAWtHpwb9RHepG/+E4GWIdeONc2QeaZp4Pf4siWDgKva/SKxMMn4XObFAJ/TY/H
uAsXsqboou0mr8i1FyMt0CWoTmOZD7Ki3obZ/zQiwiV/CkBurZ+/tCbjN7dLKAbT
iMRK7r5M0GN5Ow56rSwe5Y9uro3Pm1UIl/JohdTWExP04YLd4e1hC+p8qn+91lU=
=ocPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 18:50:15 UTC