W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

From: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1961367407.443122.1422298138586.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
+1 on which expressive power for the ontology. It's important for inferences/validations.  

      From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
 To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> 
Cc: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@yahoo-inc.com>; Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>; "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>; "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> 
 Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 8:49 AM
 Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology
Hash: SHA1

Is there going to be the possibility of at least listening in remotely?


On 01/24/2015 12:02 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> ATM I can only answer for disjointness axioms. We plan to use them for 
> cleaning up extracted data so we definitely want them. For the rest, we
> are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we invite ontology
> experts to participate.
> Best, Dimitris
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Good points all, I think.
> As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered
> for the ontology language.  For example, will disjointness axioms be
> allowed, or local ranges, or constraints?
> peter
> On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas Torzec wrote:
>> Hi Dimitris et al.,
>> A) What is the specific use you have in mind?
>> B) Are you thinking about a centralized ontology managed by editors, a 
>> user-contributed ontology, or an automatically generated taxonomy?
>> C) How will it relate to other ontologies, taxonomies and schemas?
>> Also, will it relate to Wikidata, Wikipedia, schema.org
>> <http://schema.org>,
> Facebook OG, etc.
>> D) How will you categorize Wiki pages (and possibly other documents) 
>> against this ontology?
>> Cheers. -N.
>> -- Nicolas Torzec Yahoo Labs.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in
> Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of
> bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
> compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet 
> _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion
> mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net 
> <mailto:Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
> -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of
> Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org 
> Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Version: GnuPG v1



Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 18:50:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:30 UTC