Re: What should we call RDF's ability to allow multiple models to peacefully coexist, interconnected? from Sampo Syreeni on 2014-03-11 (semantic-web@w3.org from March 2014)

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 03:11:42 +0200 (EET)
To: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org>
cc: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403110234340.12609@lakka.kapsi.fi>

On 2014-03-10, Timothy W. Cook wrote:

> It is obvious that RDF is incredibly useful for most business cases.

I don't think it is, especially on the current margin. Or if it is, name 
one application where it does or even can rake in more than Oracle, 
VoltDB, Vertica, Cassandra and the others do together.
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 01:12:12 UTC