Re: ISO 15926, semantic web enhancement of ISO 10303

What are you looking for in particular? I am myself in the process of sending white papers for a new division of Internet of Data, Internet of Devices and Internet of DNA to several technical committees and there is much confusion about how to fit into the new scheme of things that what we call the semantic web, or in more practical terms linked data.

I will send you some of my findings tomorrow, you may for now prefer to look for linked data instead of semantic web when going through international standards, in particular as they relate to big data and the IoT (Internet of Things).

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and repositories of data and information for sustainable development

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

On Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:15 PM, John Flynn <> wrote:

I had long expected, or at least hoped, that by now organizations such as the Auto Alliance (1) would have developed a peer-reviewed generic automobile ontology which their individual automobile manufacturers, and potentially others, could modify, or import, as needed for their specific needs. Other alliances and associations for other domains could also create "approved" ontologies for their membership. Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be enough demand from association membership to support this sort of standardized ontology development.
John Flynn
From:Brent Shambaugh [] 
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:45 PM
To: Paul Tyson
Subject: Re: ISO 15926, semantic web enhancement of ISO 10303
Yes, I was considering an ontology for a Tesla. I downloaded a number of their patents, but wanted to make use of existing efforts to save time and improve output if possible. I liked ISO 15926 due to the flexibility that it seemed to promise over all of the ISO 10303 APs [2]. 
I found focus area in ISO 10303 for automotive would be AP 214 [1]. I found it helpful that you linked to the Product modelling W3C efforts. 
I'm trying to meet this through construction of an EIS that allows participants to easily join and leave, and allows for small participants. At this point, I'm trying to put together what is out there. I hope this falls in line with Tesla's business case.
"We believe that Tesla, other companies making electric cars, and the world would all benefit from a common, rapidly-evolving technology platform."
[2] (pg. 62)

-Brent Shambaugh

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 03:54:51 UTC