- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:13:44 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Phil, in that case why are SPIN constraints not included? It's a member submission. http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-constraints On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Just to jump in on this... > > On 10/07/2014 03:58, Juan Sequeda wrote: > [..] > >> Are you looking for something like Integrity Constraints ala relational >> world? If so, then RDF as-is is not the tool for you. I know that there >> are >> some extensions that do support integrity constraints in RDF: >> http://docs.stardog.com/icv/-- > > > We (W3C) are close to seeking member approval for a new WG that will define > a standard for just such a constraint language. Nothing definite yet but > hopes are high that the draft charter at > http://www.w3.org/2014/rds/charter will be taken up. That document links to > some member submissions that are helping to drive the conversation. > > The doc also includes a link to the mailing list where it's being discussed. > > Cheers > > Phil. > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 11:14:11 UTC