- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:37:56 +0100
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Hi Martynas, See the thread on this very topic at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2014Jul/ Phil. On 10/07/2014 12:13, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Phil, in that case why are SPIN constraints not included? It's a > member submission. > http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-constraints > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> Just to jump in on this... >> >> On 10/07/2014 03:58, Juan Sequeda wrote: >> [..] >> >>> Are you looking for something like Integrity Constraints ala relational >>> world? If so, then RDF as-is is not the tool for you. I know that there >>> are >>> some extensions that do support integrity constraints in RDF: >>> http://docs.stardog.com/icv/-- >> >> >> We (W3C) are close to seeking member approval for a new WG that will define >> a standard for just such a constraint language. Nothing definite yet but >> hopes are high that the draft charter at >> http://www.w3.org/2014/rds/charter will be taken up. That document links to >> some member submissions that are helping to drive the conversation. >> >> The doc also includes a link to the mailing list where it's being discussed. >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil. >> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 11:38:23 UTC