Re: RDF/POST format

Submission to the W3C would be a good idea. I'll admit, I have only fuzzy
ideas about how to manage that. The current license might be a problem
though - it's CC, which isn't compatible with the public domain assignment
which it's my understanding the W3C required.

It is super useful, though! Especially coupled with RDFa layed on the
appropriate form. I've been working on a full ReST/RDF framework, with bare
browsers supported through this method and it's looking really promising.

Judson


On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martynas Jusevičius
<martynas@graphity.org>wrote:

> Well, I'm just ignoring the unrecognized keys :)
>
> I wonder if the specification could be submitted to the W3C? And get
> some status, say Note or something. It's a pity this encoding is not
> standardized, because it's really useful.
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As specified, it's unclear what a parser should do with unrecognized keys
> > (especially before the initial rdf=). It's in the spirit of the
> > specification that they should be ignored, but making that explicit
> would be
> > nice.
> >
> > Also, the omission of a curie format for lt= is surprising. Something
> like
> > tn= and tv= akin to on= and ov= would make sense, so I've been wondering
> > about it being absent.
> >
> > Judson
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Martynas Jusevičius <
> martynas@graphity.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Judson,
> >>
> >> I'm using it extensively for RDF input and have implemented a
> >> Jena-based browser:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-browser/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/client/reader/RDFPostReader.java
> >>
> >> What do you want to extend? I've used it successfully as it is.
> >>
> >> Martynas
> >> graphityhq.com
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I've been using and attempting to implement
> >> > http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html
> >> >
> >> > I've got no idea how official that representation format is, but
> >> > attempts to
> >> > contact the author have failed. Is it in use anywhere else? Would it
> be
> >> > painful to extend somewhat?
> >> >
> >> > Judson
> >
> >
>