Re: RDF/POST format

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:35:56 +0100, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote:

> Submission to the W3C would be a good idea. I'll admit, I have only  
> fuzzy ideas about how to manage that. The current license might be a  
> problem though - it's CC, which isn't compatible with the public domain  
> assignment which it's my understanding the W3C required.

W3C requires a non-exclusive assignment of copyright to them, so they can  
license it under their document license.

But that's also incompatible with the current license as I read it. Unless  
you write it as an extension to the HTML specification. Or rewrite all the  
text yourself. Or get permission from the author. Or request W3C's  
permission to produce another spec under CC-by

cheers

chaals

> It is super useful, though! Especially coupled with RDFa layed on the  
> appropriate form. I've been working on a full ReST/RDF >framework, with  
> bare browsers supported through this method and it's looking really  
> promising.
>
>
> Judson
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martynas Jusevičius  
> <martynas@graphity.org> wrote:
>
>> Well, I'm just ignoring the unrecognized keys :)
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if the specification could be submitted to the W3C? And get
>>
>> some status, say Note or something. It's a pity this encoding is not
>>
>> standardized, because it's really useful.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As specified, it's unclear what a parser should do with unrecognized  
>>> keys
>>
>>> (especially before the initial rdf=). It's in the spirit of the
>>
>>> specification that they should be ignored, but making that explicit  
>>> would be
>>
>>> nice.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Also, the omission of a curie format for lt= is surprising. Something  
>>> like
>>
>>> tn= and tv= akin to on= and ov= would make sense, so I've been  
>>> wondering
>>
>>> about it being absent.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Judson
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Martynas Jusevičius  
>>> <martynas@graphity.org>
>>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Hey Judson,
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> I'm using it extensively for RDF input and have implemented a
>>
>>>> Jena-based browser:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-browser/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/client/reader/RDFPostReader.java
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> What do you want to extend? I've used it successfully as it is.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Martynas
>>
>>>> graphityhq.com
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com>  
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> > I've been using and attempting to implement
>>
>>>> > http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html
>>
>>>> >
>>
>>>> > I've got no idea how official that representation format is, but
>>
>>>> > attempts to
>>
>>>> > contact the author have failed. Is it in use anywhere else? Would  
>>>> it be
>>
>>>> > painful to extend somewhat?
>>
>>>> >
>>
>>>> > Judson
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
         chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 10:34:03 UTC