W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2014

Re: RDF/POST format

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:31:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE35Vmxn9uWadX=KsTNyZ2LzFpvaFx=F3nEtw2pO5Vj100K1KQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Well, I'm just ignoring the unrecognized keys :)

I wonder if the specification could be submitted to the W3C? And get
some status, say Note or something. It's a pity this encoding is not
standardized, because it's really useful.

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote:
> As specified, it's unclear what a parser should do with unrecognized keys
> (especially before the initial rdf=). It's in the spirit of the
> specification that they should be ignored, but making that explicit would be
> nice.
>
> Also, the omission of a curie format for lt= is surprising. Something like
> tn= and tv= akin to on= and ov= would make sense, so I've been wondering
> about it being absent.
>
> Judson
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Judson,
>>
>> I'm using it extensively for RDF input and have implemented a
>> Jena-based browser:
>>
>> https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-browser/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/client/reader/RDFPostReader.java
>>
>> What do you want to extend? I've used it successfully as it is.
>>
>> Martynas
>> graphityhq.com
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I've been using and attempting to implement
>> > http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html
>> >
>> > I've got no idea how official that representation format is, but
>> > attempts to
>> > contact the author have failed. Is it in use anywhere else? Would it be
>> > painful to extend somewhat?
>> >
>> > Judson
>
>
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 21:31:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:47 UTC