- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:31:14 +0100
- To: Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Well, I'm just ignoring the unrecognized keys :) I wonder if the specification could be submitted to the W3C? And get some status, say Note or something. It's a pity this encoding is not standardized, because it's really useful. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote: > As specified, it's unclear what a parser should do with unrecognized keys > (especially before the initial rdf=). It's in the spirit of the > specification that they should be ignored, but making that explicit would be > nice. > > Also, the omission of a curie format for lt= is surprising. Something like > tn= and tv= akin to on= and ov= would make sense, so I've been wondering > about it being absent. > > Judson > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> > wrote: >> >> Hey Judson, >> >> I'm using it extensively for RDF input and have implemented a >> Jena-based browser: >> >> https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-browser/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/client/reader/RDFPostReader.java >> >> What do you want to extend? I've used it successfully as it is. >> >> Martynas >> graphityhq.com >> >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I've been using and attempting to implement >> > http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html >> > >> > I've got no idea how official that representation format is, but >> > attempts to >> > contact the author have failed. Is it in use anywhere else? Would it be >> > painful to extend somewhat? >> > >> > Judson > >
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 21:31:42 UTC