Re: {Disarmed} Re: How to put an annotation in HTML?

Hello Hugh,
indeed, what you want goes more into the direction of ontology learning 
and actually, I would say that your example is arguable.

If it were a definition, the kind of annotation you propose would be 
feasible:

The terms <span 
its-ta-ident-ref="http://nerd.eurecom.fr/ontology#Location">location</span> 
and place in geography are used to notice and or identify a point or an 
area on the Earth's surface or elsewhere.

Actually, what you mean and what is practical and useful is:
<span its-ta-ident-ref="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dublin" 
its-ta-class-ref="http://nerd.eurecom.fr/ontology#Location">Dublin</span> is 
a location.

Although the first case, where you can define an ontology and mark up 
the references of classes in the text, is nice, it remains rather 
academic and marginal, while the other one is relevant for web-scale.

All the best,
Sebastian


Am 28.04.2013 11:48, schrieb Hugh Glaser:
> I'm not sure its-ta-class-ref is what I meant.
> Your example (simplified a little):
> <p><span
>            its-ta-class-ref="http://nerd.eurecom.fr/ontology#Location"
>            its-ta-ident-ref="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dublin">Dublin</span>
>        is the capital of Ireland.</p>
> Sort of thing I meant:
> <p><span its-ta-ident-ref="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dublin">Dublin</span> is a
>            <span its-ta-ident-ref="http://nerd.eurecom.fr/ontology#Location">Location</span>
>       in Ireland.</p>
>
> I am guessing I would need to do that, rather than use its-ta-class-ref.
> (Assuming you can guess what I think I might be achieving!)
> One says that this is a resource from a class, and the other says that this is a class.
>
>
> On 27 Apr 2013, at 19:13, Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hugh,
>>
>> Am 27.04.2013 18:47, schrieb Hugh Glaser:
>>> Actually, your example <span its-ta-ident-ref="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#developer">someone who works on</span> is quite interesting as #developer is an rdf:property. This might actually be problematic later in RDF as it causes OWL Full, when used as an object.
>>> Ah - I think that is why I put it in - to see what happened :-)
>>> I was thinking of putting a Class in as well, but I guess that makes less difference.
>> Classes are tackled with its-ta-class-ref . Named Entity Recognition and Linking (i.e class (Person, etc.) and entity link) are a much more common use case than relation extraction, which is why we included it from the start. This was a given separation done by language tools, any how. Making a distinction between instances, properties (object, datatype), classes and annotations is OWL specific, so the motivation+rationale comes from a different domain.
>> -- Sebastian
>>
>
>


-- 
Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Events: NLP & DBpedia 2013 (http://nlp-dbpedia2013.blogs.aksw.org, 
Deadline: *July 8th*)
Venha para a Alemanha como PhD: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/csf 
Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://linguistics.okfn.org , 
http://dbpedia.org/Wiktionary , http://dbpedia.org
Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org

Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 05:14:57 UTC