- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:46:31 -0400
- To: leon@dcs.shef.ac.uk
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Denny Vrandeèiæ <denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnEFWTeMkmZspKe1Cr7QAzphrOZngQ-CdXMSdEq=6Sq2_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Leon Derczynski <leon@dcs.shef.ac.uk>wrote: > On 24 April 2013 21:32, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Martin Hepp < >> martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Denny, >>> First, I think you describe a scenario that has a lot of application >>> areas :-) >>> >>> One solution could be for the W3C agree upon a "NULL" URI (e.g. URN) for >>> properties and objects in RDF triples, for use in RDFa and elsewhere. This >>> would allow using the existing RDFa spec for your purpose. >>> >>> For instance, the W3C could define the URN NID "rdfa" >>> >>> Then, you could simply write >>> >>> <p>It is well known, that <span about="http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/" >>> typeof="urn:rdfa:NULL" >Springfield</span> has mild summers and short, but >>> hard winters.</p> >>> >>> (I did not check whether URNs are valid for typeOf, but I think so) >>> >>> An RDFa validator would be okay, an RDFa parser could be set to ignore >>> the resulting triples, and if not, nothing harmful would happen. >>> >>> Another solution would be to use the owl:Thing URI, i.e. >>> >>> <p>It is well known, that <span about="http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/" >>> typeof="owl:Thing" >Springfield</span> has mild summers and short, but hard >>> winters.</p> >>> >> >> I like the idea of owl:Thing. From reading the initial email from Denny >> saying that he is not trying to assert triples, something even simpler >> would be to just use the @resource attribute from RDFa Lite [1]: >> >> <p>It is well known, that <span resource=" >> http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/">Springfield</span> has mild summers >> and short, but hard winters.</p> >> >> The above markup would validate 'as is' in HTML5 without even the need to >> use any particular RDFa doctype. Your parser would just have to look for >> the resource attribute and take the URI from there. >> >> > Would it also validate under a strict DTD, or in XHTML? An annotation that > forces designers to interact with browsers in quirks mode will have reduced > uptake. > yes it would as long as you specify the right doctype for RDFa, e.g. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" " http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd"> Steph.
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 19:47:03 UTC