- From: Leon Derczynski <leon@dcs.shef.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:42:52 +0200
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Denny Vrandeèiæ <denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPjwwFo_1Y3waWMR82mxUQB-AqL21jfTjQEVsRsevR3sNusTug@mail.gmail.com>
On 24 April 2013 21:32, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Martin Hepp < > martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > >> Hi Denny, >> First, I think you describe a scenario that has a lot of application >> areas :-) >> >> One solution could be for the W3C agree upon a "NULL" URI (e.g. URN) for >> properties and objects in RDF triples, for use in RDFa and elsewhere. This >> would allow using the existing RDFa spec for your purpose. >> >> For instance, the W3C could define the URN NID "rdfa" >> >> Then, you could simply write >> >> <p>It is well known, that <span about="http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/" >> typeof="urn:rdfa:NULL" >Springfield</span> has mild summers and short, but >> hard winters.</p> >> >> (I did not check whether URNs are valid for typeOf, but I think so) >> >> An RDFa validator would be okay, an RDFa parser could be set to ignore >> the resulting triples, and if not, nothing harmful would happen. >> >> Another solution would be to use the owl:Thing URI, i.e. >> >> <p>It is well known, that <span about="http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/" >> typeof="owl:Thing" >Springfield</span> has mild summers and short, but hard >> winters.</p> >> > > I like the idea of owl:Thing. From reading the initial email from Denny > saying that he is not trying to assert triples, something even simpler > would be to just use the @resource attribute from RDFa Lite [1]: > > <p>It is well known, that <span resource="http://sws.geonames.org/4951788/">Springfield</span> > has mild summers and short, but hard winters.</p> > > The above markup would validate 'as is' in HTML5 without even the need to > use any particular RDFa doctype. Your parser would just have to look for > the resource attribute and take the URI from there. > > Would it also validate under a strict DTD, or in XHTML? An annotation that forces designers to interact with browsers in quirks mode will have reduced uptake. > Steph. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-lite/ > > -- Leon R A Derczynski Research Associate, NLP Group Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield Regent Court, 211 Portobello Sheffield S1 4DP, UK +45 5157 4948 http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~leon/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 19:43:24 UTC