- From: John Breslin <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:12:58 +0000
- To: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>, Rob Styles <rs@kasabi.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CB67DB3A.256AA%john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
You may also be interested in looking at how Ecospace adapted SIOC for use in Enterprise Workspaces: http://www.ami-communities.eu/wiki/ECOSPACE/SIOC See also Boeing Insite: http://www.w3.org/2009/Talks/Boeing-tpac09.pdf Thanks! John http://bresl.in On 20/02/2012 11:02, "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> wrote: > "Rob Styles" <rs@kasabi.com> wrote: >> > Perhaps if you could give some concrete examples of what you want to >> describe, real entities and their attributes and relationships, then folks on >> here can suggest models for them? I mean real example data to work with. > > Well, I guess I could, although I don't waste too much of peoples' time. :) > However, there's two things to say to that ; > > 1. Yes, I'll provide some examples, but 2. Ready-made ontologies also work as > a shared platform for thought, and I was hoping not to make my own as there is > tons of stuff I might miss out on, forget, not realize, etc, and so on. My > trust in my own fallability is rather fuzzy. > > Anyway, I'm creating a rather all-encompassing Intranet platform (I use Topic > Maps rather that RDF, but I can convert back and forth with some ease) that > basically is an application delivery platform. Lots of overlapping domains > that somehow encompasses the concept of "Intranet"; CMS, KM, DMC, CRM, and a > few other good shorties. I could use ontologies from each field, but the > overlap is staring me in the face, laughing at my feable attempts at unifying > them without creating too much complexity. > > Even an upper ontology at this point would be good. Examples of entities are > people, projects, companies, organisations, clients, systems, domains, > partners, reports, documents, printers, machines, hardware, software. And then > relationships on top, grouping, collections, direction, cardinality, impact, > range, and so on. > > I can imagine doing it myself and ending up with a couple of hundred entities > and maybe a hundred relationships (I like them slightly ambiguous :) ), but I > was expecting to have a hard problem selecting between them, and not a hard > time *finding* them. > > Anyway, any help would be lovely. > > Thanks, > > Alex > -- John Breslin www.johnbreslin.org Lecturer, Engineering and Informatics, NUI Galway www.nuigalway.ie Researcher, Social Software and Semantic Web, DERI www.deri.ie General Chair, AAAI ICWSM-12, 4-8 June 2012, Dublin www.icwsm.org johnbreslin on LinkedIn / Skype / Twitter / Facebook
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 11:13:33 UTC