W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Intranet ontology?

From: Ghalem Ouadjed (EOWEO) <gouadjed@eoweo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4F42318F.7000407@eoweo.com>
To: John Breslin <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
CC: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>, Rob Styles <rs@kasabi.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
ITSMO ontology concerns IT service but some classes and properties a 
nicely ambigous :)
maybe that could helps:
http://ontology.it/itsmo/v1/itsmo.html

Cheers
Ghalem

Le 20/02/2012 12:12, John Breslin a écrit :
> You may also be interested in looking at how Ecospace adapted SIOC for 
> use in Enterprise Workspaces: 
> http://www.ami-communities.eu/wiki/ECOSPACE/SIOC
>
> See also Boeing Insite: http://www.w3.org/2009/Talks/Boeing-tpac09.pdf
>
> Thanks!
>
> John
> http://bresl.in
>
> On 20/02/2012 11:02, "Alexander Johannesen" 
> <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     "Rob Styles" <rs@kasabi.com> wrote:
>     > Perhaps if you could give some concrete examples of what you want
>     to describe, real entities and their attributes and relationships,
>     then folks on here can suggest models for them? I mean real
>     example data to work with.
>
>     Well, I guess I could, although I don't waste too much of peoples'
>     time. :) However, there's two things to say to that ;
>
>     1. Yes, I'll provide some examples, but 2. Ready-made ontologies
>     also work as a shared platform for thought, and I was hoping not
>     to make my own as there is tons of stuff I might miss out on,
>     forget, not realize, etc, and so on. My trust in my own
>     fallability is rather fuzzy.
>
>     Anyway, I'm creating a rather all-encompassing Intranet platform
>     (I use Topic Maps rather that RDF, but I can convert back and
>     forth with some ease) that basically is an application delivery
>     platform. Lots of overlapping domains that somehow encompasses the
>     concept of "Intranet"; CMS, KM, DMC, CRM, and a few other good
>     shorties. I could use ontologies from each field, but the overlap
>     is staring me in the face, laughing at my feable attempts at
>     unifying them without creating too much complexity.
>
>     Even an upper ontology at this point would be good. Examples of
>     entities are people, projects, companies, organisations, clients,
>     systems, domains, partners, reports, documents, printers,
>     machines, hardware, software. And then relationships on top,
>     grouping, collections, direction, cardinality, impact, range, and
>     so on.
>
>     I can imagine doing it myself and ending up with a couple of
>     hundred entities and maybe a hundred relationships (I like them
>     slightly ambiguous :) ), but I was expecting to have a hard
>     problem selecting between them, and not a hard time *finding* them.
>
>     Anyway, any help would be lovely.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
>
> --
> John Breslin www.johnbreslin.org
> Lecturer, Engineering and Informatics, NUI Galway www.nuigalway.ie
> Researcher, Social Software and Semantic Web, DERI www.deri.ie
> General Chair, AAAI ICWSM-12, 4-8 June 2012, Dublin www.icwsm.org
> johnbreslin on LinkedIn / Skype / Twitter / Facebook
>
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 11:42:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:27 UTC