- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:35:33 +0100
- To: Denny Vrandečić <denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Denny, This is a very interesting comment! We created these specific properties with the hope that they might be useful for cases like yours. But it ended up being too restrictive. Something for us to reflect upon. Thanks! If you do want to go into details about all these different derivation relationship, you are always encouraged to extend the prov:wasDerivedFrom property and build your own specific extensions. But I am sure you know this already, and I am not sure whether you do want to go into that much detail! Look forward to your updates! Cheers, Jun On 08/08/2012 13:33, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Hi Jun, > > almost perfect! prov:hadPrimarySource is a tiny bit too strong (it > requires that source is from first-hand direct experience etc.), > whereas its superproperty prov:wasDerivedFrom is a bit too weak, but > can be used here. > > So if there was a prov:hadSource between these two, I would gladly use > it, not having the strong requirements for the source. > Otherwise I will settle for prov:wasDerivedFrom for now. > > Thank you again, that helped a lot! > > Cheers, > Denny > > > 2012/8/8 Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>: >> Hi Denny, >> >> >> On 08/08/2012 13:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote: >>> >>> Every statement has an IRI. And the source will also have an IRI >>> describing it (i.e. an IRI for the statistical yearbook, an IRI for >>> the mentioned paper). >> >> >> By this, do you really specially asking for a property to express that a >> statement about an entity is derived from a certain primary source? >> >> How about the http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#hadPrimarySource? >> >> Note that there are some renaming going on around this property. If you want >> to use more than the above property, such as prov:source or >> prov:qualifiedSource, then please ping us before you do so. >> >> HTH, >> >> Jun >> >> >>> >>> What I did not figure out is: which property from the provenance >>> ontology can I use to connect the statement IRI to the source IRI? >> >> >> -- >> Jun Zhao, PhD >> EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellow >> Department of Zoology >> University of Oxford >> Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road >> Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK >> > > > -- Jun Zhao, PhD EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Zoology University of Oxford Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 08:36:01 UTC