- From: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:29:31 +0000
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi, I have a curiosity/problem/request for suggestions which is loosely related to the Referee/Referred identification. In my case, I need to predicate on a URI, intended as an identifier. So (keeping canonical example), I can have: http://xx/Berlin This is the URI of the thing per se. http://xx/web/Berlin Points to a web representation http://xx/data/Berlin Data representation Now I can predicate in all these documents on http://xx/Berlin referring to the actual city. But I need to predicate on "http://xx/Berlin" intended as an identifier: in my case, this goes through cycles of approvals and states. In practice I would need to tell whether my URI is approved, reserved, invalid! and so on... These are clearly not properties of the city of Berlin! How is this case usually approached ? In principle, it should be quite common. What I was considering (in order of preference): 1) perhaps some as hoc extension of OWL (annotations). At the end this is an overgrown versioning mechanism 2) creating a dichotomy between "identifiers objects" and "identifiers codes". This could make some sense in my case as identifiers come as codes that inherit some 'unconvential' semantics. 3) ignoring the distinction and putting it relegating to the semantics of relations (a bit like 1, in the end, but dirtier) 4) ignore informations on URIs on the web (delegating it to some internal engine). This may be a last resort solution. Any idea ? ciao, Andrea Andrea Splendiani Senior Bioinformatics Scientist Centre for Mathematical and Computational Biology +44(0)1582 763133 ext 2004 andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 14:30:21 UTC