Hi Felix Sasaki wrote: > This makes a lot of sense, since otherwise you get many triples without > use cases. Also, there are differences between the properties in terms > of stability and data sources. See > http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.1.0/ucd/UCD.html for what is available > in version 5.1. Note also that there is information about characters > which is not in the properties' data base, e.g. whether a character can > be used in an internationlized domain name or not, see > http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/idna.jsp . So again, it really depends > on the use case what information you want in the RDF representation. There's also a lot of information being collected in wiki-style at <http://www.decodeunicode.org/>. It has information about individual characters (e.g. <http://www.decodeunicode.org/en/u+203d>) and Unicode blocks (e.g. <http://www.decodeunicode.org/en/armenian>). Regards, SimonReceived on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 14:59:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:22 UTC