- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:51:28 +0000
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo@ge.imati.cnr.it>, Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
- CC: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
Riccardo, > Thanks for the great work you did, this document clarifies large part of the > issues I was facing providing the VOID description for my datasets. Thank *you*. > I have just a little remark concerning section 4.2: it introduces > void:uriSpace, but distinctions in the use of > void:uriRegexPattern\void:uriSpace are not so clear. Indeed, void:uriSpace has enjoyed some attention and caused some discussion lately [1]. In fact we intentionally left the range of this property undefined for now [2] and would encourage people to comment on this (best would be directly on the issue tracker, which reduces our workload as well ;) > Why don't use always void:uriRegexPattern? > I think an example where void:uriSpace is handier than > void:uriRegexPattern would be worth. For this part I'd like to hand over to Richard, really ... Cheers, Michael [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/void-discussion/lnak4X6xnLo/discussi on [2] http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=91 -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo@ge.imati.cnr.it> > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:37:55 +0100 > To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> > Cc: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org> > Subject: Re: please review: draft W3C SWIG Note 'Vocabulary of Interlinked > Datasets' (voiD) > Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:17:36 +0000 > > Dear all, > Thanks for the great work you did, this document clarifies large part of the > issues I was facing providing the VOID description for my datasets. > > I have just a little remark concerning section 4.2: it introduces > void:uriSpace, but distinctions in the use of > void:uriRegexPattern\void:uriSpace are not so clear. Why don't use always > void:uriRegexPattern? > I think an example where void:uriSpace is handier than > void:uriRegexPattern would be worth. > > Regards, > Riccardo > > > > > > > On 16 December 2010 15:35, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > >> Dear Semantic Web Interest Group, >> >> As you might recall, semantic-web@w3.org is the home list of W3C's >> Semantic Web Interest Group. Unlike other more industrious groups we >> exist primarily as a discussion forum. However, occasionally some of >> us get together and collaborate, and these collaborations can give >> rise to W3C Notes (eg. from a while back, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/ >> ). So, several SWIG members have been collaborating (in an open and >> public way) on something called 'voiD', and have produced a draft of a >> SWIG Note, details below. The voiD work addresses issues around RDF >> dataset description and discovery, and I'm very pleased to propose it >> as a W3C SWIG Note. >> >> We don't have a very rigid process for these notes, but they are >> useful to do, and we should perhaps do them more often. I've asked >> the voiD team to give a brief outline of the work, and we suggest a >> deadline of end of January 2011 for feedback comments. There is a >> snapshot 'Editor's Draft' for review in SWIG space at W3C [8] below, >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/void/ and discussion is welcomed >> here on semantic-web@w3.org >> >> So thanks to Keith Alexander, Richard Cyganiak, Michael Hausenblas, >> Jun Zhao for their hard work on all this, and to you all in advance >> for your reviews and feedback. Assuming no major issues are found, we >> should be able to proceed with publishing it as a W3C Note during >> February. >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> Please find below the voiD SWIG Note submission: >> >> === >> The 'Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets' (voiD) is an RDF-Schema vocabulary >> for expressing metadata about RDF datasets. With voiD, the discovery and >> usage of Linked Datasets can be performed both effectively and efficiently. >> A dataset is a collection of data, published and maintained by a single >> provider, available as RDF, and accessible, for example through >> dereferenceable HTTP URIs or a SPARQL endpoint. >> >> The development of voiD started in mid 2008, with a first version of the >> vocabulary and guide published in 01/2009 [1]. Since then, voiD has enjoyed >> considerable uptake in the Linked Data community and beyond, with usage >> throughout from data.gov.uk to individual datasets [2]. >> >> A number of voiD-based implementations is available via [3]. The >> development >> of the core voiD vocabulary and the guide is an open process with a >> dedicated mailing list [4] and issue tracker [5]. >> >> W3C-wise, voiD is relevant for the work in the SPARQL WG [6] as well as the >> upcoming eGov WG [7]. >> >> We hereby submit the Editor'sDraft 'Describing Linked Datasets with the >> voiD >> Vocabulary' [8] to W3C's Semantic Web Interest Group (SWIG) with the goal >> to >> publish it as a W3C Interest Group Note. We appreciate feedback on this >> draft >> till 31 Jan 2011 via the 'semantic-web@w3.org' mailing list. >> >> Cheers, >> the voiD 'Editors Team': >> Keith Alexander, Richard Cyganiak, Michael Hausenblas, Jun Zhao >> >> [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/void/guide/2009-01-29 >> [2] >> http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/lodcloud/state/#data-set-level-metadata >> [3] http://semanticweb.org/wiki/VoiD >> [4] http://groups.google.com/group/void-discussion >> [5] http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/ >> [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/ >> [7] http://www.w3.org/2011/govdata/charter >> [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/void/ >> === >> >> > > > -- > -- > RICERCA E FUTURO CAMMINANO INSIEME: > CIRCA IL 50% DEI LAVORATORI DELLA RICERCA SONO PRECARI > IL FUTURO NON DEVE ESSERE PRECARIO! > --------------------------------------------------- > RESEARCH AND FUTURE WALK TOGETHER: > ABOUT 50% OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN RESEARCH > RELY ON A TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT THAT IS EXPIRING IN FEW MONTHS. > FUTURE SHOULDN'T BE SHORT-DATED! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475697 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/ima/albertoni.htm > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 14:53:04 UTC