W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2011

Re: fact checking for semantic reasoners

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:43:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMXe=SpxiGAHPYteGDPJv68f=u=auRwnLN8BHMky5KubdHUG1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Its been a while since I studied artificial intelligence, but
I remember writing fact checking routines implemented with rules at the time
were pretty basic stuff

The way I did it at the time was to model the fact checking routines
that humans carry out (some professions have specific rules/protocols for
fact checking, such as the legal or the forensics professions, other just
follow their common sense)
and all have their limitations, of course

I am sure the concept can be refined ad libitum

will send you a link to the paper, and would welcome input/feedback


On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>wrote:

> On 29 Aug 2011, at 11:44, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> > ha ha, no- the reasoner (or the ontology) would need to check its facts
> via a simple routine  have a built before it spews its outcome
> This simple routine being?
> --e.
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 11:43:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:25 UTC