W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2011

Re: void vocabulary, typo?

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:19:37 +0100
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-Id: <E3EC16BA-291F-4A9A-97C1-AB7F434D8DB9@deri.org>
To: Martin G. SkjŠveland <martige@ifi.uio.no>

Martin,

I'm one of the VoID authors, pleased to meet you.

> I'm thinking the property wv:declaration should be used instead?

Yes, sounds sensible to me, thought IANAL ;)

Maybe one of the Talis chaps (Ian, Tom, etc. if you're reading this)  
can help clarify.

Process-wise this document can't simply be updated as it is a SWIG  
Note now - we're currently collecting errata etc. and schedule a new  
version in some point in the future.

Thanks for pointing this out, Martin!

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 1 Aug 2011, at 13:22, Martin G. SkjŠveland wrote:

> Hi,
>
> in the example in section
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#license
>
> the propery wv:waiver is used to give a description of the terms of  
> use of a dataset. By the looks of
>
>  http://vocab.org/waiver/terms/#declaration   and
>  http://vocab.org/waiver/terms/#waiver
>
> I'm thinking the property wv:declaration should be used instead?
>
> Martin
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 17:20:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:25 UTC