W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2011

Re: How To Do Deal with the Subjective Issue of Data Quality?

From: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:58:23 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikv=j7B8hu2BvArNRJDF3GmWjfhjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:

> All,
> Apologies for cross posting this repeatedly. I think I have a typo free
> heading for this topic.

Ok, I'll give you points for trying so hard.  But I feel duty-bound to point
out to you that cross-posting is generally considered bad form for a reason.
 Apologizing doesn't really make it good form.

> Increasingly, the issue of data quality pops up as an impediment to Linked
> Data value proposition comprehension and eventual exploitation.

Precise formal definitions would be a good start.  "Data" can mean just
about anything.

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 19:01:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:24 UTC