Re: SPARLQ endpoint discovery

• From: Francisco Javier López Pellicer <fjlopez@unizar.es>
• Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:06:03 +0200
• To: semantic-web@w3c.org
• Message-ID: <4D98468B.6010209@unizar.es>

>
> A related question is SPARQL endpoint fingerprinting... Which
> is not necessarily straightforward as often people put them
> behind HTTP reverse proxies that stomp on identifiable
> headers... In principle it would be interesting to do a
> survey to see the relative prevalence of different SPARQL
> implementations.

Agree.

SPARQL endpoint discovery and SPARQL endpoints fingerprinting could be 
two research lines related with the architecture of SemWeb:

- Indexing SPARQL enpoint (with/without the help of vocabularies such as 
void) -> A hint for knowing the effective size of the SemWeb initiatives

- SPARQL endpoint fingerprint identification -> "Market share" analysis 
of SPARQL technology pervalence

-- fjlopez

Received on Sunday, 3 April 2011 10:06:39 UTC