- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:34:04 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi, Am 26.09.2010 13:31, schrieb Toby Inkster: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:41:53 +0200 > Bob Ferris<zazi@elbklang.net> wrote: > >> ex:APerson ex:ASkill ex:ATopic . >> >> ex:ASkill a cco:skill ; >> ... . # further descriptions > > I think, as cco:skill is currently defined anyway, that should be: > > ex:ASkill rdfs:subPropertyOf cco:skill . > > This kind of pattern is the main use case for allowing predicates to be > blank nodes. (The current version of RDF does not allow this, but N3 > does.) > > ex:APerson [ rdfs:subPropertyOf cco:skill ; ... ] ex:ATopic . Okay, as far as I get, this is then a On-the-Fly-Property[1], or? I catched up the modelling approach of the Property Reification Vocabulary[2] made by Toby Inkster and designed it as an Ontology[3]. One can create now implications for inferencing. The prv:shortcut property should be handled the case of restriction or verification of the applied shortcut property. Although, where is now the difference to RDF-Reification? ;) Cheers, Bob [1] http://esw.w3.org/OnTheFlyProperties [2] http://esw.w3.org/PropertyReificationVocabulary#Possible_Use_Case_-_Change_logs [3] http://smiy.sourceforge.net/prv/spec/propertyreification.html
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 21:34:38 UTC