Re: Any objections against using xsd:anySimpleType or rdfs:Literal as the rdfs:range for OWL datatype properties? from Alan Ruttenberg on 2010-09-23 (semantic-web@w3.org from September 2010)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:43:36 -0400
To: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <AANLkTikC8ozqq=6TmBjru2hwG7PpxqdqsaSMuE-d3fk6@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net> wrote:

> I am a bit confused now, does this mean that a property with a range of
> xsd:duration can't be a owl:DatatypeProperty? (e.g., it's a fundamental
> datatype for signal processing modeling)

That's correct, for OWL DL. If you have some examples of how you might
reason with durations, I might be able to suggest methods of doing so
within bounds of what is allowable with OWL DL.

-Alan

> Cheers,
>
>
> Bob

Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 16:12:18 UTC