- From: Jeszenszky Péter <vackor2@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:05:39 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hello, Based on [1] I have made an implementation of Boris Motik's proposal [2] to model list-like structures in OWL 1 DL and in OWL 2 DL. I think that the solution may be regarded as a general design pattern to model typed lists in OWL. My small OWL DL ontology is available at http://purl.org/net/vocabulary/list.owl The ontology defines the following classes to represent lists: List: superclass of all list classes LiteralList: class representing lists of literals IndividualList: class representing lists of individuals EmptyList: a class with a single instance (nil) representing the empty list Using the vocabulary it is possible to describe lists in OWL DL consisting only of individuals or literals, or both. It is also straightforward to subclass the list classes to model typed lists (lists that contain only instances of a given class or datatype). To demonstrate that the ontology defines the class IntegerList for handling list of integers. If the base list classes are subclassed appropriately, then class EmptyList is a subclass of each list class implicitly (in our case EmptyList is also a subclass of IntegerList). For demonstration purposes the ontology also contains 4 List instances. Notice that the type of the instances are not specified explicitly, it can be inferred from the ontology. The inferred type of C and D is IntegerList, C is an instance of LiteralList implicitly, while A is a List instance. Maybe it would be worth to write a more detailed explanation, a paper is on the way. (It would be really nice to have a note discussing best practices about lists in OWL.) Best regards, Peter Jeszenszky University of Debrecen, Faculty of Information Technology http://www.inf.unideb.hu/~jeszy/ *** References: [1] Nick Drummond: List Ontology http://www.co-ode.org/ontologies/lists/ [2] Boris Motik: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jun/0070.html
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 12:05:38 UTC