- From: Bob MacGregor <bob.macgregor@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:21:30 -0700
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, public-sparql-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTin=YbogmTCrrUEJ=L-p8K9y_sCybtv-pKxE_yXA@mail.gmail.com>
I would say that the mindset "NAF is not appropriate for SPARQL" is a piece of the explanation for the glacial pace of adoption of Semantic Web technology in commercial settings. If indeed SPARQL is supposed to be religiously open-world (I'm not saying I agree), then IMO that strengthens the argument for the adoption of a second RDF language, e.g., something like non-recursive Datalog with negation, that is more practical/useful. Bob On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Bob MacGregor wrote: > > Hi Pat, > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On Sep 5, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Bob MacGregor wrote: > > > My personal interest is in a query language for RDF that's easy to use, > and, among other things, > > has a negation operator that is intuitive. > > Id be interested to know what you consider to be intuitive here. Is > negation by failure intuitive for most Web sources? Do you routinely > conclude, from a failure to find a sentence asserted on a website, that it > is false? > > Fundamental to your argument seems to be "sentence asserted on a > website". If I grabbed > triples from some random Website, I might not be confident in using NAF. > But I don't do that. I work > with graphs that I've built from sources I trust, and I know which parts of > the graph are expected to > be complete, and NAF is perfect for those parts. > > > Well, bully for you, but SPARQL is supposed to be a standard for use with > RDF on the Web. These nice assumptions of completeness just where you expect > it cannot be sustained in the wider world of RDF data, and there is no way > to transmit them (the assumptions) even when they are correct. So NAF is not > appropriate for SPARQL. > > Pat > > > - Bob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > -- ===================================== Robert MacGregor bob.macgregor@gmail.com Mobile: 818-397-3468 =====================================
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 20:22:05 UTC