- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:29:49 +0000
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi All, In virtually every bit of RDF documentation I ever read, URI references are mentioned, from the rdf semantics through concepts and in the wild. However, the definition of an "RDF URI Reference" is: "an absolute URI with optional fragment identifier" http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-URI-reference General understanding (afaict) being that if it's got a fragment, then it's a URI Reference. However, if you take a look at the URI spec RFC 3986, you'll see that "an absolute URI with an optional fragment identifier" is the very definition of 'URI' and not 'URI Reference'. URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] see: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3 So, why are we all saying URI Reference, and talking about URI References when in fact we mean 'URI, not URI-Reference'? Best, Nathan
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 13:30:55 UTC