W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2010

Re: a typo in SPARQL 1.1 specification: rdf:next?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:21:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD2A55D.8010702@epimorphics.com>
To: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
CC: Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org>, semantic-web@w3.org


On 04/11/10 11:57, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> 	Currently, [1] reads:
>
>     Example: Elements in an RDF collection
> { :list rdf:rest*/rdf:next ?element }
>
> 	Yet, [2–4] (as well as the other part of the SPARQL 1.1
> 	specification itself) define rdf:first (not rdf:next) as the
> 	predicate to be used to specify list elements.
>
> 	May I assume a typo in [1]?

Thanks for pointing it out. It's fixed in the editors' working draft : see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0050.html

and the thread from that message.

	Andy

>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/#propertypath-examples
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#collections
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#collections
>
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 12:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:24 UTC