- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:21:49 +0000
- To: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
- CC: Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On 04/11/10 11:57, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Currently, [1] reads:
>
> Example: Elements in an RDF collection
> { :list rdf:rest*/rdf:next ?element }
>
> Yet, [2–4] (as well as the other part of the SPARQL 1.1
> specification itself) define rdf:first (not rdf:next) as the
> predicate to be used to specify list elements.
>
> May I assume a typo in [1]?
Thanks for pointing it out. It's fixed in the editors' working draft : see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0050.html
and the thread from that message.
Andy
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/#propertypath-examples
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#collections
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#collections
>
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 12:22:27 UTC