a typo in SPARQL 1.1 specification: rdf:next?

 Currently, [1] reads:

   Example: Elements in an RDF collection
{ :list rdf:rest*/rdf:next ?element }

 Yet, [2–4] (as well as the other part of the SPARQL 1.1
 specification itself) define rdf:first (not rdf:next) as the
 predicate to be used to specify list elements.

 May I assume a typo in [1]?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/#propertypath-examples
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#collections
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#collections

-- 
FSF associate member #7257