W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2010

a typo in SPARQL 1.1 specification: rdf:next?

From: Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:57:13 +0600
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <87lj59fgiu.fsf@violet.siamics.net>
	Currently, [1] reads:

   Example: Elements in an RDF collection
{ :list rdf:rest*/rdf:next ?element }

	Yet, [2–4] (as well as the other part of the SPARQL 1.1
	specification itself) define rdf:first (not rdf:next) as the
	predicate to be used to specify list elements.

	May I assume a typo in [1]?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/#propertypath-examples
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#collections
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#collections

-- 
FSF associate member #7257

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 11:57:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:21 UTC